Story of O PDF/EPUB Ä Story of PDF/EPUB or

Story of O The Story of O relates the progressive willful debasement of a young and beautiful Parisian fashion photographer, O, who wants nothing than to be a slave to her lover, Ren The test is severe sexual in method, psychological in substance The artistic interest here has precisely to do with the use not only of erotic materials but also erotic methods, the deliberate stimulation of the reader as a part of and means to a total, authentic literary experience Eliot Fremont Smith, The New York Times [PDF / Epub] ☉ Book Lover Author Jennifer Kaufman – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk O ★ Secret Delivery / Her 24-Hour Protector PDF / Epub ✪ Author Delores Fossen – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk who wants nothing than to be a slave to her lover ➥ [Epub] ➟ Kholodovs Last Mistress By Kate Hewitt ➯ – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk Ren The test is severe sexual in method ❮Télécharger❯ ➺ Wicked Sinner (Regency Sinners 7) ✤ Auteur Carole Mortimer – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk psychological in substance The artistic interest here has precisely to do with the use not only of erotic materials but also erotic methods [KINDLE] ❃ If the Stiletto Fits... ❧ Wendy Etherington – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk the deliberate stimulation of the reader as a part of and means to a total [Download] ➺ What Phoebe Wants (Harlequin Flipside, By Cindi Myers – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk authentic literary experience Eliot Fremont Smith ❮Download❯ ➻ Ruthlessly Royal (Self-Made Millionaires Author Robyn Donald – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk The New York Times This book must have been really something when it first came out, but to me, this was just another one of those unintentionally funny chick flicks I do realize I completely missed the point of this book, because it just completely flew by me.I won t go into detail too much but the story begins when O and her lover Rene I use an Allo Allo accent here are in the backseat of a taxi, and O is instructed to take her underwear etc off, walk into a building and let herself be abused and tortured, n This book must have been really something when it first came out, but to me, this was just another one of those unintentionally funny chick flicks I do realize I completely missed the point of this book, because it just completely flew by me.I won t go into detail too much but the story begins when O and her lover Rene I use an Allo Allo accent here are in the backseat of a taxi, and O is instructed to take her underwear etc off, walk into a building and let herself be abused and tortured, no questions asked And she ll learn to love it Why Because Rene keeps telling her he loves her so much Because she wants to do whatever he wants her to do Maybe it s because I m unable to see myself in this position, or to beaccurate, these positions, but I really don t see the point of everything that happens to O If anybody ever suggested doing something that s even remotely in the general direction of the stuff they make her do, to me, I will laugh, to see if they are serious, and if it turns out they are, I will go batshit on their ass And I do mean that in the literal sense Because it s the woman who keeps getting degraded, not the man See how he likes it.Chains, whips a riding crop for christ s sake , multiple men at multiple entrances real friends come in through the back door , wearing a ring that means you ll have to do it with every guy who knows what that ring means, wearing stuff that expands certain holes, clothes designed for easy access and last but not least never cross your legs and always part your lips.Try that last one I m serious Try looking hot and ready by doing that And I don t just mean for like a few minutes, anybody can make that pose look hot But try it everywhere and all the time You ll look like an ill mannered peasant with a saliva problem after 20 minutes.After a while it even stopped being funny and it just got boring I m sure there is a purpose for this book Possibly something of the door stopper variety i am not going to write a serious review of this book if you want to talk about why bondage erotica is bad for women or how negation porn makes its readers complicit in the victimization of women halfway across the globe or to sip tea and talk about depersonalization or dehumanization or anything even remotely intelligentpower to you, but this book bored me so much i don t even care to elevate it or grant it any sort of intellectual discussion i am really only interested in talking abo i am not going to write a serious review of this book if you want to talk about why bondage erotica is bad for women or how negation porn makes its readers complicit in the victimization of women halfway across the globe or to sip tea and talk about depersonalization or dehumanization or anything even remotely intelligentpower to you, but this book bored me so much i don t even care to elevate it or grant it any sort of intellectual discussion i am really only interested in talking about why this book is boring.i have said it before on here, but it bears repeating despite my recent fascination with monster erotica, i personally find reading about sex boring but evenboring than reading about sex reading about non sex which is basically what this book is despite the lingering on the violence and the restraining, piercing, branding, whipping, the sex act itself is glossed over to the extent that at one point o has taken on several lovers, to completion, in the span of three sentences.for example, the last line in the book it was only after daybreak, after all the dancers had left, that sir stephen and the commander, awakening natalie who was asleep at o s feet, helped o to her feet, led her to the middle of the courtyard, unfastened her chain and removed her mask and, laying her back upon a table, possessed her one after the other.penthouse letters, that is not.and it s all like that but sir stephen s hands pried open her loins, forced the buttocks portal, retreated, took her again, caressed her until she moaned.obviously, this is intended to be a sadean experiment in impersonal and objectified sex, butdetail is given in this book to the construction of dresses than to the sex act and that s fine, like i said, i have no regrets at not reading about glistening honey pots or man roots but at least that would have gotten a giggle out of me and why am i the only one reading lactation porn and wondering who is supposed to clean up after it and reading this and completely focusing on the hygiene the fact that her lover will not permit her to wear underwear fine but then he will also not let her sit upon her dress, so no matter where she is on a bar stool, at a restaurant, in the backseat of a public conveyance, she is always bare assed, and bare bellied directly on the seats.and that grossed me outthan any of theviolent tearing and whipping and piercing she undergoes.do you know where that barstool has been then don t go rubbing your open bits about on it seriously why would your lover master want you to get scabies it is contagious and don t go bloodying up the good towels after a rough session of buttsecks.it s so nasty this is what i took from story of o and i apologize, but i have my hang ups same as anyone, and i just feel like a place like roissy, with all those bodily fluids squirting everywhere and all the blood all over the floor and how often do they clean those riding crops is all i could think about.it is interesting that the bodice rippers chose this book to read during the height of fifty shades of gray mania here are some pictures from the fifty shades event at my store seriously, do you see how many people are there insanity i wasn t able to get a good photo of the author, just the woman interviewing her, but she was there, i swear.as you can see, female penned BDSM erotica is insanely popular is that redundant is there BDSM that is just casual and unerotic yes and it is this book and i get why this book story of o, i do not yet understand the shades phenomenon is a BIG DEAL because at the time, it was unprecedented that a woman would have written such a violent and debasing novel but i read it now and i can t help but think, is that all incidentally,this fifty shades phenomenon is out of hand little old ladies reading bondage porn has got to be one of the signs of the end times but even fifty shades is having troubles of course i am totally anti censorship, but if that book is as dull as this one, who s to say that they aren t dodging a bullet here by not being allowed to read it.full disclosure i read a shitty translation i am sure manny will come out and say it is better in its original language, and of that i have no doubt but i honestly don t feel that i would have enjoyed it any better in french, even if my fluency in that language had not been severely compromised by years of disuse.i read this first when i was in high school, when i thought that subversive literature would be cool i read some de sade and i read story of the eye, and i read this, and honestly, it just bored the crap out of me but i thought i still had my copy lying around turns out, i did not and i wasn t going to buy a new copy when the bodicers chose this book because i figured, quite rightly, that i wouldn t enjoy it anythe second time around than i had on the first i read the introduction of the hard copy on my break at work, and i ended up borrowing a nook so s i could read it without having to shell out the whopping 8 bucks for it and the introduction is worth reading, if you are interested in the history of its translation there exists an earlier translation of o, made in paris several years ago i trust i shall not be accused of a corresponding lack of generosity if i say and i am not the first, and far from the only one, to say it that this earlier version is less a translation than an adaptation it reads somehow as though the adapter translator were in fact embarrassed by the work certain parts are glossed over whole descriptions, nonexistent in the original, are written in and, indeed, much of the book is paraphrased rather than translated directly as one who had read the work in french when it first appeared, and admired not only its contents but the extreme felicity of the style, what troubled me mostly about the earlier english version was its seeming disdain for this obvious style subsequently, i learned this translator was a man, and it seemed to me that this fact alone sufficed to explain both the embarrassment male embarrassment manifest in his version, and also why pauline reage had gone out of her way to comment favorably on mine story of o, written by a woman, demands a woman translator, one who will humble herself before the work and be satisfied simply to render it, as faithfully as possible, without interpretation or unwanted elaboration faced with a work such as o, male pride, male superiority however liberal the male, however much he may try to suppress them will, i am certain, somehow intrude.now, i don t know about all that, but i do know that the translation i read was atrocious it was boring and at one point, it cuts off abruptly, and i was like weird, so i went to the hard copy only to find that eleven pages were missing in the electronic version what the hell as grateful as i am that lulu press exists, because they gave semen recipes to the world, i do not think they have the best copyeditors.not only were the ELEVEN pages missing, but there were roughly a million typos, which are terribly distracting when you are trying to focus on the buttsecks and those pages were the whole part about her and jacqueline and the command sir stephen gives o regarding jacqueline, and is kind of a big deal, plot wise, and is followed by one of the only interesting sections in the book, where she contemplates her role in sir stephen s orbit, and speculates upon his intent and his feelings blah blah but stephen is such a douche ,who cares, right but so why am i not going to go back and read the better translation because that sums it up i really don t care i just wanted to let everyone know that if you are interested in reading this book, DO NOT read the version on the nook or kindle or the POD lulu press one because from what i can tell, it definitely is just an adaptation, and since you probably aren t going to go learning french just to read this book, if you are going to read it, READ IT.AND OH MY GOD i wrote all that part yesterday, but i didn t post it because i wanted to do a side by side comparison of the text on the nook and the text in the hard copy, so i had to wait until i was at work to take notes and everything and I WAS WRONG they are exactly the same so this is not just an adaptation mistranslation this is the one that is supposed to be good that reage praised.holy hell.this ruins my whole review, but i do not care enough to rewrite it and this may well be my worst review ever, but i don t even care because this book bored the shit out of me TWICE and that should not be rewarded.inpersonal news, because the rest of this review has been such intensive impersonal lit crit, i know i read this on the new glow y nook which is pretty cool were i ever to buy a device for myself, i would probably buy the glow y one because i like to read while i am walking and it is much easier to read on a nook while walking than a book because you can do it all one handed LGM but the problem i was having was with night walking, and the light em up feature solves all of that i can also late night read without the lights on i want to read something scarrrry on it, all alone in the dark, and see what happens.SPOOKY even maggie approves and, no barnes and noble is not making me say this i actually like this thing and if i could get one for free and get all my books on it for free like i do when i borrow one, my life would be awesome as is, it is just mediocre like this review no this review sucks like the book.come to my blog The original ending of this book was suppressed because it supposedly objectified women However, I think the book is very empowering for women It makes very clear the difference between being submissive as a person and being submissive as a sexual preference O is a successful career woman who gets her freak on as a sexual slave We are all hedonists at heart The prudish, Protestant roots of society plus the pc attitudes for which feminism is responsible in part, make this a very shocking boo The original ending of this book was suppressed because it supposedly objectified women However, I think the book is very empowering for women It makes very clear the difference between being submissive as a person and being submissive as a sexual preference O is a successful career woman who gets her freak on as a sexual slave We are all hedonists at heart The prudish, Protestant roots of society plus the pc attitudes for which feminism is responsible in part, make this a very shocking book now But not as much as in the past for its pornographic content,no now it is seen as the choices its protagonist makes that are shocking I would recommend the book to loads of people if only because it s fabulously well written, a real literary classic and of course, it s hot, really hot How many classics can you say are that Since my child is currently one of my 2 friends, I will refrain from writing a real review of this book Manon, when you re living far far away and are much older you should check this out And when you do, please don t tell me about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *