Give Them an Argument: Logic for the Left PDF ¶ an


Give Them an Argument: Logic for the Left I liked this book and thought it was fun, though I guess for me it was just a choir preach I think for anyone that s done philosophy, this information is very self evident, so it s not super necessary to read But I can see it s necessity to the leftbroadly. Ben is the Virgil in this descent into the hell world of modern conservative thought He is a gracious and disarming tour guide in the exposition of the arguments that sustain the most retrograde forces in our culture The book went through a lot of the repulsive rhetoric of Ben Shapiro, it examined and explained a bit the cult of Ayn Rand, it got to the core of the faux libertarian fetishist s mindset, and shined a light on the unfortunate phenomenon of Nate Silver.While all these topics are ex Ben is the Virgil in this descent into the hell world of modern conservative thought He is a gracious and disarming tour guide in the exposition of the arguments that sustain the most retrograde forces in our culture The book went through a lot of the repulsive rhetoric of Ben Shapiro, it examined and explained a bit the cult of Ayn Rand, it got to the core of the faux libertarian fetishist s mindset, and shined a light on the unfortunate phenomenon of Nate Silver.While all these topics are explored elsewhere indetail, Ben ties together the thread that links all this toxic cultural sludge together peoples obsession with appearing smart and Logical Ben successfully reminds us what it means to logically analyze an argument just how much work that is, and how satisfying it can be and points us in the direction of philosophers and logicians who might interest the curious lay person Considering how unpleasant but necessary the topics covered in this book are, I was thankful for its brevity quirky and short book I like that the left is mustering a response to the specious arguments of the right which has an unearned reputation as logic nerds There are good points where Ben Shapiro is taken down and criticism of the neoliberal bias of Nate Silver However, it gets a bit into weeds with Marxist debates not everybody on the left is a Marxist I agree we need to not shy away from logical arguments with the right Show them where they are factually or logically wrong not merely odi quirky and short book I like that the left is mustering a response to the specious arguments of the right which has an unearned reputation as logic nerds There are good points where Ben Shapiro is taken down and criticism of the neoliberal bias of Nate Silver However, it gets a bit into weeds with Marxist debates not everybody on the left is a Marxist I agree we need to not shy away from logical arguments with the right Show them where they are factually or logically wrong not merely odious good primer but could have usedexamples and illustrations although the ones included are good I had been looking forward to reading this since I first heard about it on the Zero Books YouTube channel I ve also enjoyed several of Ben s appearances on the channel as well as The Michael Brooks Show The idea is actually quite brilliant I have been long tired with how many people on the left haveor less surrendered logic to the center and right The Ben Shapiro s of the world are deemed the rational and logical actors and the left emotional and irrational actors Instead of combattin I had been looking forward to reading this since I first heard about it on the Zero Books YouTube channel I ve also enjoyed several of Ben s appearances on the channel as well as The Michael Brooks Show The idea is actually quite brilliant I have been long tired with how many people on the left haveor less surrendered logic to the center and right The Ben Shapiro s of the world are deemed the rational and logical actors and the left emotional and irrational actors Instead of combatting the center and right with superior logic many of us have conceded it to them and instead chosen to ridicule those which claim to use logic.Now, for the book what Ben does great is providing a very good beginner s introduction to logic He also does a great job of breaking down where many right wing thinkers such as Ben Shapiro and Ayn Rand get logic wrong This will be a very useful tool for many leftists as they learn to construct better arguments against the right.If I had some criticisms, I d argue there are two main ones 1 It was probably too simple of a book This very well might have been intentional, and it might also be beneficial in some ways as well It s simplicity may make itaccessible However, there are tons of different nuanced aspects of logic which are regularly applied in political conversations which just don t get touched on much at all There are also things in which he mentions I would have liked him to add a bit.2 I think Ben was way too easy on the left for conceding logic to the center and right He puts a very large emphasis on the center and right using logic incorrectly, but there aren t quite as many strong criticisms of where leftists get it completely wrong here It might be that I m being a bit harsh, but I tend to hold my own to a higher standard I have noticed an extremely common practice among the left to completely abandon logic and allow emotions and ideology to control the narrative This allows for easy rhetorical victories for many of our opponents For this reason I really think it might be of some use to take a harder position against our own faults and explain how we can correct them.Overall, this is worth a read It s really short and I finished it in a couple of hours The general idea presented here is fantastic expropriating logic from right wing pundits Fighting the idea that the right is logical while the left is emotional, which would make the rightcorrect More than that, it has a message of intelectual honesty about debating as a means to understanding and truth and not just as some sort of mental wrestling with a goal to destroy and crush your opponent Ben Burgis writes in a very informal and friendly way while still presenting various importa The general idea presented here is fantastic expropriating logic from right wing pundits Fighting the idea that the right is logical while the left is emotional, which would make the rightcorrect More than that, it has a message of intelectual honesty about debating as a means to understanding and truth and not just as some sort of mental wrestling with a goal to destroy and crush your opponent Ben Burgis writes in a very informal and friendly way while still presenting various important topics from logic and reasoning from informal fallacies to the truth tables and symbolic logic while avoiding silly textbook examples that don t help you understand those concepts in the wild Ben uses examples that answer to people like Ben Shapiro, Steven Molyneux and Ayn Rand that claim to be logical by using real logic to dissect their arguments and attempting to get his points through with logical validity or at least inductive strength.That being said, the informality in the presentation sometimes makes it feel like a collection of blog posts which might feel off putting now and then and the sequence and flow of ideas feel somewhat disconnected.Overall, it is a must read to leftists who wish to engage in debate and not be instantly considered overtly emotional and illogical Considering the cover of this book shows a picture of the famous eighteenth century philosopher David Hume shushing conservative commentator Ben Shapiro as he tries to say Facts don t care about your f , it would be easy to assume that author Ben Burgis will use this book as an excuse to bash right wing ideas using the most hyperbolic language, as seems to be the trend However, one of his main arguments ends up being just the opposite While he agrees that the left should continue to shame, Considering the cover of this book shows a picture of the famous eighteenth century philosopher David Hume shushing conservative commentator Ben Shapiro as he tries to say Facts don t care about your f , it would be easy to assume that author Ben Burgis will use this book as an excuse to bash right wing ideas using the most hyperbolic language, as seems to be the trend However, one of his main arguments ends up being just the opposite While he agrees that the left should continue to shame, call out, privilege check, and diagnose the allegedly unsavory motivations of those on the right, he argues they must go beyond this They must also avoid the sloppy reasoning often involved in destroying the other side and learn to sharpen their logical thinking, both because they will maintainlogically consistent arguments and have better answers to challenges from the right.Burgis showcases this kind of logical and even tempered thinking throughout He strikes a nice balance between making arguments against common right wing views e.g., the left is too emotional, taxation is theft, altruism is destructive and explaining logical forms and fallacies This is not merely a book that uses politics to highlight logical frameworks, but one meant to allow readers to begin applying logic to the political discourse.His writing is clear and down to earth As a professor of logic and philosophy, he is well aware how pedantic, theoretical, and downright dorky some of these logical exercises seem, and he addresses these issues head on with both self deprecating wit and clear real world examples He also distinguishes some of the key differences between socialists, liberals, and centrist technocrats in a way that often gets ignored, particularly by those on the right.While there are many enlightening moments, the best part of the book is the chapter on Ben Shapiro His popular slogan facts don t care about your feelings is rooted in the idea that Liberalsget their moral judgments from feelings while Steely eyed conservatives like Ben Shapiro get their moral judgments from facts However, this is fallacious because facts, in and of themselves, cannot make moral judgments People who make arguments must do so through a combination of fact and value, and, whether they realize it or not, both liberals and conservatives do this.The only real problem I had with this book was the list of twelve rules for reasoning listed at the end I often find that books like this offer advice that is just too general to be of much use, and, unfortunately, this book is not much different in that regard While there are helpful examples in each chapter, I think the ending would have been better had in gone indepth Even so, there is a lot to be learned here I will almost certainly be revisiting this book periodically to grapple even further with some of these ideas and recharge my reinvigorated interest in logic Many serious leftists have learned to distrust talk of logic and logical fallacies, associated with right wing logicbros This is a serious mistake Unlike the neoliberal technocrats, who can point to social problems and tell people trust us , the serious Left must learn how to argue and persuade In Give Them an Argument, Ben Burgis arms his reader with the essential knowledge of formal logic and informal fallacies [Download] ➾ Paid Boyfriend By kimpyvon – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk associated with right wing logicbros This is a serious mistake Unlike the neoliberal technocrats ☆ [PDF / Epub] ★ Pro PHP XML and Web Services By Robert Richards ✩ – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk who can point to social problems and tell people trust us ⚣ [PDF] ✅ Lyrics of Life By Abraham Messler Quick ✰ – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk the serious Left must learn how to argue and persuade In Give Them an Argument [Reading] ➿ Wahhabism By Hamid Algar – Ralphslaurensoutlet.co.uk Ben Burgis arms his reader with the essential knowledge of formal logic and informal fallacies The thesis of the book is that a lot of leftists fail to give other people reasons for why they believe what they believe when disagreeing with others This book is a reminder to explain the reasons At the outset, the book addresses some of the sociological reasons why leftists have ceded logic and reason to centrists and right wingers Some of the reasons have to do with the annoyance of protracted arguments on social media, libertarian arguments from first principles that no one but libertari The thesis of the book is that a lot of leftists fail to give other people reasons for why they believe what they believe when disagreeing with others This book is a reminder to explain the reasons At the outset, the book addresses some of the sociological reasons why leftists have ceded logic and reason to centrists and right wingers Some of the reasons have to do with the annoyance of protracted arguments on social media, libertarian arguments from first principles that no one but libertarians would have The author Ben Burgis is willing to admit that some of these arguments will be pointless and so it might be better not to get involved in them But he points out that in situations where there is an audience, the point of carrying out the argument logically is not to convince the person you re arguing with of your beliefs but rather to convince the audience, those people who eavesdrop on the argument Fair enough.The book is fine Give Them and Argument is not an exhaustive explanation of logic, nor is it an exhaustive logical defense of leftist ideas What it is, though, is a great primer on both formal and informal logic, and how leftist concepts can be argued such that they aren t supported by fallacies of either type If you re tired of logic being the apparent sole domain of internet libertarians, then consider reading this Whether you agree with Ben Burgis s politics or not, this will help you fortify your argume Give Them and Argument is not an exhaustive explanation of logic, nor is it an exhaustive logical defense of leftist ideas What it is, though, is a great primer on both formal and informal logic, and how leftist concepts can be argued such that they aren t supported by fallacies of either type If you re tired of logic being the apparent sole domain of internet libertarians, then consider reading this Whether you agree with Ben Burgis s politics or not, this will help you fortify your arguments for your positions, and help you understand that just because an argument is logically rigorous, does not mean it is right.If you already have a background in both in formal and informal logic, then consider giving it a view, as the text is brief, clear, and entertaining enough given the subject matter I like the idea behind the book but the writing seems to be a bit rushed.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author: Ben Burgis

Ben Burgis is a graduate of Clarion West, and he has an MFA in Creative Writing from the Stonecoast program in Maine He writes speculative fiction and realist fiction and grocery lists and Facebook status updates and academic papers He has a PhD from the University of Miami, and currently holds a post doctoral fellowship at Yonsei University in South Korea His work has appeared in places like Podcastle and GigaNotoSaurus and Youngstown State University s literary review Jenny His story Dark Coffee, Bright Light and the Paradoxes of Omnipotence appeared in Prime Books anthology People of the Book A Decade of Jewish Science Fiction Fantasy.